GM Crops Like Golden Rice Will Save Lives of Hundreds of Thousands of Children
quillette.com
quillette.com
Good heavens... I hope nobody actually believes this stuff. How many uncited pro-GMO talking points can you spot above?
This article brought to you by Syngenta's PR department.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/the-benefits-of-carbon-...
If so, surely we shouldn't use this GMO crop?
If you want to get more efficiency out of the food system you can easily do that by going vegan. Raising livestock provides just 18% of calories but takes up 83% of farmland. If you cut out meat you get 83% of the farmland back. You don't even need to cut out meat completely - just have a couple more meals each week without meat and you're saving many times more than any GM crops could achieve.
[1] https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/failure-yield-evaluating-pe...
[2] https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/hidden-costs-industrial-agr...
BT toxin is an essential tool of organic farmers, that in normal circumstances only ever appears on the surface of plants, and can be rinsed off. Some GM crops make the plant produce the toxin throughout, where it cannot be rinsed off. Nobody knows whether BT toxin is safe for humans to consume in such quantities, but in any case a very likely short-term outcome of widespread use of such crops is insects resistant to BT toxin, and farmers in need of a new alternative.
Most of the GM crops are less pernicious but no more defensible. Soybeans that are resistant to glyphosate are patented, so farmers have to buy new seed every year, and they drive increased use of glyphosate on farms.
How do we get yellow rice without getting all the crap? Nobody knows.
I find myself seeing this pattern everywhere but I'm not sure if I've got an appropriate word to describe it.
Like a climate change denier pretending they're worried about birds being killed by wind turbines. They know that we know they don't care, but they say it anyway, because they know that we can't help but care about that kind of thing.