And you responded to the weaker interpretation of my argument. And so we are in a loop.
my orig response was an innocent, curious question while his was an impulsive rant/essay.
my orig response was an innocent, curious question while his was an impulsive rant/essay.
I'm not sure there is any stronger interpretation available here. You're baselessly speculating on gp's emotional state. That is the opposite of "assume good faith."