Any focused ultrasound tech has potential to gain wide acceptance but it is mostly the imaging component (MRI guided in most cases) that hold it back due to costs and availability.
Any focused ultrasound tech has potential to gain wide acceptance but it is mostly the imaging component (MRI guided in most cases) that hold it back due to costs and availability.
Pro: hair growth. Con: decimated libido.
Not every procedure lends well to alternative imaging modality (Brain surgery is one) but ultrasound guided FUS is really where there is potential to increase adoption.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3064817/
The "expensive thermometer" point is interesing. Cant we develop a cheaper one?
The (un)fortunate point of MRI thermometry is that is not only very effective at reading temperatures, but it can also produce thermal dosage maps that help in characterizing tissue leisioning (the exact response of HIFU ablated tissue is still be debated). On top of that you also get traditional MRI imaging essentially for free.
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-25904-9
[2] https://www.fusfoundation.org/diseases-and-conditions/neurol...