Hacker News Reader

Comment by killjoywashere | Hacker News Reader

MRI is probably the major technical cost. It's fairly high touch and the magnets wear out, so the capital cost of each test is fairly real. That and the professional component. Interventional radiologists are very much in the consultant/handyman/engineer business of "Treatment: $1; knowing where to put it: $9999"

View on HN

In Japan an you can get an MRI for $160 US I hear

Do you get the radiologist's read for $160? Do they put an ablative ultrasound probe in you and hold it for an hour for $160?

Honestly I’m not sure with the 160 covers. It’s just another one of those things in our medical system that is priced a bit too high to make sense for a good number of folks. I would like to see healthcare be more accessible.

What's the purpose of an ablative ultrasound probe in an MRI? An MRI uses high intensity magnetic fields, not ultrasound.

Medical treatment in Japan is mostly paid for by the government with the individual co-pay being 30-0% depending on the procedure.

The cost to the patient =! the actual cost of the procedure.

I would pay £0 for spending the night in the hospital even tho the cost of the trauma bed alone is £3200 per night according to NHS England.

It’s not paid by the government, it’s paid by the health insurance system that everyone must enroll in and had to pay for every trimester. Granted, it’s not too expensive.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com