Should you write an article that can be summed up by "no"?
>For a lot of tasks the performance works well, but for extreme precision it will not fly — yet.
But we all knew that going in, didn't we?
>For a lot of tasks the performance works well, but for extreme precision it will not fly — yet.
But we all knew that going in, didn't we?
>is not a silver bullet
>opens up a lot of opportunities
>accelerate their R&D efforts
>Imho
>reaching a tipping point
>gap
>starting to disappear.
This is what it reads like:
"we're getting to being able to approach the cusp of potentially honing in on the vicinity of the realization of this technology in the future"
So your entire response doesn't commit to any strong claim at all but it sure sounds like it does!
Incidentally I wonder if you're aware you're doing this or if it comes, subconsciously, from reading lots of writing that's like this.