On the other hand, your comment suggests that you are someone who tries to win a discussion by clumsily insulting his opponent.
I think that we do partly agree on a thing. The way so many are-- as I like to put it-- running massive marketing campaigns to define and redefine "acceptable" and "unacceptable" is pretty horrible. We probably don't agree on which definitions should stick or fall away, but that's off topic, too.
"Is that an accident" was not entirely meant to be the accusing rhetorical question that it seems like now. It's also, what's your angle? And you answered that.
P.S. (hating people with stupid views) < (hating their stupid views)
Thats a bit of a stretch.. Common decency about CP is pretty much universal. But if that triggers you. Too bad.