Nitter: Alternative Twitter Front-End
github.com
github.com
https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/blob/8836cf51e8a6b385e1ac0a...
The project is cool. The de-crapified interface is nice (no weird JavaScript loading, no nags to login, t.co). But that also makes me think that the hosted version (nitter.net) is pretty doomed, since it directly undermines Twitter commercially.
edit: A google search brings me to this. https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/my-bot-has-stopped-working...
Seems it is from twimg, which I believe is the image host used for tweets with images attached? I wonder why they can't revoke this.
And interestingly, the js file linked in that forum post is still alive... https://abs.twimg.com/k/en/init.en.37d4e85afd8ede9741dd.js
I've been using a different extension "Redirector", and setting my own rules. But this should cover most of them!
If you're not logged in you're only seeing the cesspool of default reddits... I would recommend avoiding that
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/requestcontro...
Start with the rule “[hostname=nitter.net]” for twitter.com requests
Whenever I see projects like this that are just public, and designed to be available across large regions, I'm always curious what the logistics behind them are. Big companies talk about their infrastructure, and tiny blogs talk about their infrastructure. I don't hear a lot from people in the middle.
I mean, I see the installation instructions, but is this just running on a single VPS? Are you setting up multiple servers and trying to load-balance between them or anything?
Regarding usage stats I don't have any accurate numbers, but the database that stores preferences has 30k rows.
Very compelling stuff.
But to tweet, you need a Twitter account. And as I recall, Twitter pretty much demands verification through a mobile account. Do virtual mobile accounts typically work for it?
And maybe I don't read enough to trigger roadblocks. Or maybe I just block enough stuff.
Solution is of course to not use twitter.
The horrible interface is probably the main reason why I never got into Twitter. It's very hard to follow stuff, bercause it gets sorted in (for me) useless ways. Plus the fact that even generally interesting people retweet (or even tweet) some cringeworthy stuff.
Many services seem to run checking on whether a number is really a mobile number or not. VK (the Russian social network) for one example is a zealot about that and won't let any Twilio numbers through. And Instagram is a lot tighter (better at fake account creation detection) on authentication than Twitter but you can still sign up for Instagram with just an email account in most cases.
I'd be curious though to know if eg Twitter security sends a request over to Twilio (perhaps in a case of an account abuse investigation), if they'd cough up information very willingly. That I don't know. It's a certainty the government can get at it, however. The best bet is to do nothing illegal using a Twilio number, and to assume if a big external service provider (Twitter, Facebook, et al.) needs to get details for some legal reason, they will.
There must be some specific logic to translate twitter links over
https://nitter.net/search?f=tweets&q=2fb.me&since=&until=&ne...
How much longer is this anti-JS ideology going to dominate HN?
> Unofficial API (no rate limits or developer account required)
It sounds brittle.
When it shows who retweeted something on a political thread they had comical derogatory names. Is that something you actually spent time on or is that user generated content
Suggestion: put a screenshot of the regular theme in the read me as well.