It is useless to make claims about a particular fuel without looking at a concrete reactor design. Leftover isotopes for example are very dependent on neutron flux and neutron energy as well as general breeding properties of the reactor. This in turn decides the waste to be dealt with, proliferation risk and possible reuse of leftover fuels from previous generation reactors (which the submission didn't even discuss).
Also, the answers lack nuance. E.g. proliferation risk is present through U233, however, U233 seems very difficult to deal with in bombmaking. So at least it's less of a problem maybe.