If a right is something that makes society better if people have it, then access to Wikipedia or something like it is definitely a right.
And in fact it falls under freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
And in fact it falls under freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
That's not what a right is. Saying that access to Wikipedia is a right implies the ability to coerce somebody to give it to you if you lack it. At best it's a privilege.