Hacker News Reader

I don’t think I’m the one missing the point. You seem to be rebutting points I didn’t make, like other languages (or magic bullets) afford a bug count of zero. You also seem to be ignoring my point, which is that C is in a different ballpark than other languages in its difficulty of implementing correct software.

View on HN

you did say that other languages are more secure, and the parent post here is asserting the entire platform is insecure therefor no languages are secure, which is true.

however i disagree with both of you that writing safe C is hard. most of the problems i see relate to incorrect pointer usage or memory management. use stack allocated containers from libs very well tested and pass references. this removes entire classes of bugs from popping up. one thing you can’t do with C is be lazy.

I absolutely guarantee that if you throw AFL at any modestly complex C program that you have written that it will find bugs. Guarantee. This isn't about laziness.

safe and bug free are different things. nobody writes big free code but writing safe code isn’t as hard. also i’m not entirely sure how a program proves lack of laziness, if anything it proves laziness

Reply on news.ycombinator.com