Hacker News Reader

Isn't she explicitly not referring to only one party? If she is, why is it ironic that it's not clear which?

> The documents reveal a much clearer idea of what actually happened in the 2016 US presidential election, which has a huge bearing on what will happen in 2020. It’s the same people involved who we know are building on these same techniques,” she said

I m confused, were the Democrats being accused of using manipulative social media ad campaigns in 2016?

Not sure, but they definitely did it in 2012, back when it was considered cool and forward-looking, to the point of bragging about it in interviews[0].

I don’t blame them for doing it at all, but i definitely feel uneasy about a lot of democrats blaming 2016 elections on cambridge analytica and acting like their party didn’t do it themselves, while also bragging about it publicly.

Note: I neither support nor am affiliated with the republican party whatsoever. I also don’t think that cambridge analytica scandal affected the 2016 election outcome in any significant way.

0. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-...

Do you accuse people of the obvious a lot? Because manipulative ads seem to be the lingua franca of us politics.

Not accusing anyone

Reply on news.ycombinator.com