> A Trump loss would be presumably be to one of the avowed socialists running
Oh bless, the tendency in the US towards labelling people still right of the centre by most countries' standards as "socialists" for being left of the Republicans is cute.
Oh bless, the tendency in the US towards labelling people still right of the centre by most countries' standards as "socialists" for being left of the Republicans is cute.
Of course people can agree or disagree with the ideology, but only you here seem to have attached stigma to the word.
(Though the same could have been said for 'fascist', which certainly now has widespread stigma attached, and most proponents have stopped self-describing as such.)
Social-liberal isn't socialist. I live in a liberal-social democracy, but very few workers own the means of production here.
> but only you here seem to have attached stigma to the word.
American society as a whole has attached a stigma to it. Claiming otherwise is either disingenuous or ignorant, I'll let you take your pick as you listen to the dulcet tones of Ronald Reagan disclaiming the dangers of socialised medicine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYrlDlrLDSQ