> The ten most populous Bay Area cities listed above have a combined point-in-time homeless total of 63,527

If you add up all the homeless numbers listed for each city in the article this number is actually 23,528.

What is considered a healthy occupancy rate for a city? 100% occupancy would obviously not be ideal since there would be no places for people to move to.

Are there any direct stats on vacant home ownership as a means to hold money?