You're coming across as someone with an intense confirmation bias.
It's important that Facebook and other tech giants not be allowed to harm society in the coming decade. But an intense and emotional overreaction only makes that position seem less credible to the uninformed.
But haven't those same companies already proven themselves to not be credible by their actions? What happens when everyone doesn't have this reaction, we get complacent and it's too late because they've already taken control? That's not confirmation bias, that's critical thinking.
> Many of the interpretations you have, and the intents and beliefs you claim Zuckerberg holds, are not evident in the article.
This is like listening to Pooh bear saying he's going to eat less honey this year because he wants to lose weight without ever reading any of the books.
when i read Zuck's post, I thought to myself he has a solid vision on how to compete with the Chinese companies that have huge overlaps with how he thinks mobile will be used in the coming decade.