The article doesn't really touch on how this plays with generics, if at all. Anyone know if we can do:

    public record MktOrder(T currency, int amount)<T> { }

or

    public record MktOrder<T>(T currency, int amount) { }

Would be a bummer if it breaks the idiomatic (and canonical) way of working with generics. In any case, it's a much needed and welcome feature.