Your repository had an Apache License up until yesterday, which parts of the License do you feel that is being violated?
It seems he is selling this product as a SaaS, so not necessarily redistributing the software but I could be mistaken.
It seems he is selling this product as a SaaS, so not necessarily redistributing the software but I could be mistaken.
See https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#redistribution
You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License;
Note how that information could be placed anywhere, even a remote and not well accessible or logical place. Would that solve the complaint the top poster has? Not really.
Would most people that potentially buy this software even read that information? Or be wanting to redistribute the code? After all, the code is already freely distributed and available!
Not that I condone the behavior - I think it is deplorable, it is stealing, it breaks the spirit of the license.
It is more about not fully understanding what licenses may be used for.