> focus on simplicity
> explicitly uses Xorg instead of Wayland
Just as I thought. No actual simplicity, just some neckbeards complaining about software evolving in the last 20 years.
> explicitly uses Xorg instead of Wayland
Just as I thought. No actual simplicity, just some neckbeards complaining about software evolving in the last 20 years.
Care to rephrase that without the insulting terminology?
You can still prefer X11 for its features, like network transparency, but it is more complex than Wayland.
Those concerns are more important for graphical desktop environments, not so much for terminal multiplexers [1]. Therefore most existing Wayland compositors are focused on conventional desktop users. People with a "I just need a bunch of terminal windows" mindset will look at these and complain about bloat, but it's not really bloat to be able to play games without screen tearing (an issue that I always had with Xorg and that's just gone with Wayland). And it's not bloat to be able to play audio in Firefox either (Firefox afair only supports PulseAudio).
[1] Referencing the old 90s joke that Xorg is just a graphical terminal multiplexer, since the average Unix user mostly just uses it to have multiple terminal emulator windows open at the same time.
The default compilation option is PulseAudio, but some distros (eg. Debian) also enable ALSA support. On OpenBSD Firefox uses sndio.