> Just because you cannot detect something does not make you wrong nor does it mean it doesn't exist. What a ridiculous statement.
If you cannot detect something, it's can be equally ridiculous to say it exists.
If you cannot detect something, it's can be equally ridiculous to say it exists.
Was it ridiculous to say those might exist?
Obviously we mostly remember those theories that turned out to be right.
That is not how science works. There are other ways of judging if a theory is worth exploring than just a "it must be testable right now".