> Nobody owns
There's the problem. The name exists, so somebody owns it.
Who has more right to it? The countries with a big river with that name running through it, or the ecommerce startup from really not that long ago?
There's the problem. The name exists, so somebody owns it.
Who has more right to it? The countries with a big river with that name running through it, or the ecommerce startup from really not that long ago?
Why would Amazonian nations care about Amazon.com? It’s a company called amazon on a commercial TLD. They aren’t even commercial entities.
As a TLD it offers a much more broad use.
Especially if he got rich by exploiting workers (through low wages and bad working conditions, like wearing diapers) and exploiting state regulations (through tax evasion).
Access to clean, drinkable water is a human right, btw.