Poll: Should HN add a proper quoting syntax?

No. Proper or more sophisticated quoting syntax would encourage an author to offload some or most of the interpretation of the quoted sample to the reader.

In the interest of the reader(s), the author should extract the meaningful from the quote and present it in a simple, readable form thus demonstrating that time & effort have been spent on (a) understanding and (b) asking the right question/presenting distilled information.

Currently there are two ways to quote on HN which both have problems: indentation to create preformatted text that's often unreadable on narrow screens and the * > asterisks * convention, which is rather syntaxy and not discoverable.