Not really. Most hardware is very standard these days, which is why you can install Ubuntu on most any laptop or desktop and have it work with less than or equal issues than a Windows install.
Amd and Nvidia both have Linux drivers that work on all the popular distros.
The reason devs don't even bother with Linux is because there isn't enough people that are playing on Linux.
This is actually one of the root causes. It would be SO MUCH EASIER, for me, an app developer, if every linux user used centos, or ubuntu, or mint, or whatever the hell. Don't care, pick one. But, customizing is part of the fun... anyways.
Also yeah, desktop Linux is about 10% of users, depending on who you ask. Worse for gamers, although that's just feedback loops.
There's one more thing though, which most people aren't aware of... driver versions. Drivers often ship game-specific hacks for performance fixes. It's an insane, unspoken practice that occurs because some developers will only test heavily on one mfg GPU. Right now, nvidia is taking the brunt of the work because consoles are AMD based.
What is the state of vulcan across drivers and engines?
Doom 2016?
> What is the state of vulcan across drivers and engines?
Quite good actually. Intel has older generations supported than on windows. There are 2 mature AMD vulkan implementations.
Also through investments of valve there is a new shader compiler in the works that got merged in mesa which helps quite a lot. The performance is about equal, but sometimes faster under windows (I didn't look at benchmarks of 2020). Oh and vulkan 1.2 is implemented in mesa 20.
Oh and it's vulkan not vulcan