Why Bitcoin Is Not Universally Adopted and How to Change It
forklog.media
forklog.media
Also, if something does go wrong, there's no technical or legal recourse (that I'm aware of). I'm just out of luck.
Also also, there isn't any regulation that I'm aware of. In the absence of regulation, there isn't legal recourse and anybody in the industry can do anything they like.
Sure, some of that might be just hype around the bad things. But the sheer number of thefts, scams, hacks, etc, means that for many (most?) people, using a cryptocurrency is just not worth the risk.
The fact that massive profits can be made by the lucky few only serves to reinforce the impression that it's not a safe environment.
(e.g. the basis for the instability is that banks borrow with a short term and lend with a long term; when there is a recession naturally some of those long term promises are broken, short term depositors walk, and banks can fail in a cascading chain failure.)
The 2008 crisis showed many reasons why you shouldn't trust ordinary banks. The folks involved with Bitcoin have the same problems, except unlike bankers they aren't regulated and we don't have any control over their bad behavior.
They've offered nothing trustworthy except the argument that it's great for 100 different illicit uses
UX is why adoption sucks, both from a technical and soft perspective. The only reason it had adoption prior was because people want to get rich quick.
Bitcoin is a store of value, not a currency. Stop expecting wide adoption and daily use.