Toyota's Recall Crisis: What Have We Learned?
blogs.hbr.org
blogs.hbr.org
How completely unreliable our media can be when it comes to anything not having to do with Jersey Shore or American Idol?
Forgive the snark, but the idea that a company lost all that money, sustained such damage to their brand and image built over so many years simply because of a media that failed to do their jobs makes my blood boil.
ANA is the launch customer for the 787, a few stories about safety concerns could end up with an 18month delay while the Japanese space agency does a study.
This would also hit Toyota's rivals (Mitsubish and Fuji) who are building parts for the 787.
I was recently at the Toyota museum in Nagoya. Toyota was originally founded to bring pride back to post-war Japan, and I think that principle is still at work in the company today.
The author does not mention the advantages that would come to GM as a result of this recall. Since the gov is an owner of GM, you could argue there was a potential conflict of interest here.
See this ->>>
"GM isn't wasting any time taking advantage of Toyota's weakened position after its massive recall and sales stoppage. The General has just announced new incentives for current Toyota customers.
In a phone call to Inside Line, a GM official said the new offer consists of zero percent financing for 60 months on most Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac models. Cash buyers get $1,000 toward a down payment and lease customers can get a waiver of three payments up to $1,000.
To qualify for the incentives, customers must show proof that they own or lease a Toyota.
This is starting to get interesting. "
http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2010/01/toyota-reca...
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JziQfDN...
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:t5XDNqP...
"Their perception is your reality."
He was talking about management, and maintaining a good image to your employees, but the phrase applies to everything.
People's perception was that Toyota had some terrible electrical problems, and the news media, being a for-profit endeavor, ran with it.
So Toyota's perceived problems became reality, and we needed to devote 10 months of the brightest engineering minds in the world to change that.
Unfortunately, that's how things work.
Sadly, that's not how it works. People will forever remember that Toyota had horrible safety problems, and not that they were actually exonerated in the end.
But people (and therefore politicians) see NASA and think smart. It just shows you how political this whole mess was.
An automotive engineer will know how automotive companies usually design braking and acceleration systems. They can tell you if Toyota did something out of the ordinary compared to the industry standard. Assuming they didn't, the automotive engineer is no more qualified to go deeper than that than any other mechanical engineer. So bringing in a forensic engineer who knows how to deconstruct accidents is probably far more relevent than bringing in an automotive engineer who knows how to create a braking system by stiching together vendor components.
PS: NASA engineers were contracted to conduct research into whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHTSA-NASA_Study_of_Unintended_...
Interesting side note: The Hubble Space Telescope used a basically stock (totally stock?) intel 486 in its computer - mainly, I'm told, because they came out of the box with remarkable radiation resistance. I was a mechanical guy, however, so don't quote me on that.
But regardless of what NASA did or did not find, there were real accidents involving throttles which were stuck open for minutes at a time with the engine completely overpowering the brakes. Recall that in the 100mph LA crash which set off the investigation the brakes were completely destroyed.
That is a real design flaw, an error of commission by Toyota. Other cars, for example VWs, have a brake override and the drivers manual documents an accelerator "double-tap" protocol for giving the accelerator priority, say when starting on a steep hill.
Furthermore, in the week after the recall, the president of Toyota announced that Toyota throttle systems would henceforth include a brake override. Here's their official press release making good on that promise:
http://pressroom.toyota.com/pr/tms/toyota-extends-brake-over...
So I can't develop too much sympathy for Toyota. They made a basic design mistake in a safety critical system, and then refused to acknowledge the problem. That mistake and their mishandling of it cost them a ton of money and that is exactly as it should be.
Deleted comment
I had a Ford and I put in rubber floor mats on top of the OEM carpet ones. No problem upon installation, but overtime they slipped up behind my pedals and I had problems with braking/acceleration. I stopped, got out, pull the floor mat back 3", and everything was fine. Now if I feel the floor mat creeping up I just pull it back. If you took 3 seconds to open your door and look at the mat behind the pedals it was an obvious problem.
I've had the exact same problem with the rubber floor mats on a Mazda 6, Subaru Forester, and Ford Explorer. The solution everytime is the same, pull the floor mat back into its proper position. It really isn't that hard.
So Toyota gets blamed for something that can happen to anyone, anytime, using any car and any floor mat. Why is that?
(On the other hand, Toyotas are far from perfect, on my girlfriends Toyota the sun visor is so far out of position in order to lower it you need to rotate the rearview mirror out of its way about 2". How did that pass QA?)
The fact that he had time to call 911 and didn't do this first is shocking to me. I knew this trick since I was 16 - and cars aren't even my thing.