Regardless, the Taycan is a hell of a machine and is going to have better fit and finish than a Tesla. It’s also the hot new thing, whereas the Model 3 is old news.
Assuming you can afford both, I can’t think of anyone who’d take the Tesla over the Taycan.
That's ignoring Tesla's historical issues with fit and finish/quality control.
Taycan Turbo S is certainly priced in Roadster territory, but the 4S trim that just started delivery is right in line with Model S. There will be many people cross shopping Taycan 4S against Model S.
There are numerous articles and YouTube videos exploring this if you want further information.
As far as range testing goes I’ve never heard of a Tesla not being able to meet its epa estimated range, and I find it hard to believe that Porsche would be advertising a low range if they’re capable of achieving something better.
Taycan will peak charge at 270 kW. Tesla Model 3 on a V3 supercharger peak at 250 kW. They are pretty close.
Heh, Porsche has been doing this with their combustion cars for ages.
"But, when next to the car, I was stunned. Not only was the paint without any discernible flaw, but the various panels formed a body of precision that was beyond reproach. Gaps from hood to fenders, doors to frame, and all the others appeared to be perfectly even, equal side-to-side, and completely parallel. Gaps of 3.5 to 4.5mm are considered word-class. This Model 3 measured up."
https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/a28008116/tesla-model-...
Anyone who genuinely believes this is lying to themselves.
How come you’ve copypasted this same comment 3 times in a row?
And anyway, the quoted bit is about panel gaps, that’s only a relatively minor part of fit and finish. Try sitting in a tesla and an actually nice car.