1. Everything you seem to be asking for seems like it is not relevant at this point in the project's lifecycle. 2. IMO people who are capable of providing good contributions don't actually need what you are asking for. They can review the README as is, review the source code, etc.
In short, patience.
It would be interesting to see examples of specific such advantages that could be gained, because I'm having a hard time thinking of any.
Personally, HN would be my go-to if I had a project to show and for which I was hoping for some high-quality collaboration.
If by 'reaching directly out' you mean contacting specific people, then it shouldn't be a public repo. Like I said, it's under a Facebook org, of course others will find it.
Two days later I got a one-star review on the now-defunct cpanratings site complaining about the lack of documentation.
“ Rome is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.
Rome is not a collection of existing tools. All components are custom and use no third-party dependencies.”
A transpiler is a type of compiler, so it's fine to just call it a "compiler".