This is inaccurate - it was very clearly not intended to 'create discord between users' and claiming that it was is at best politically biased and at worse a lie.
If it was a prank he would have done it and admitted it without getting caught in-between.
Also, it has to be funny to be a prank, otherwise it's bullying, where was the punchline?
> It was a pranking attempt that fell flat
You're spinning, not them.
Even assuming it was a "prank", it was meant to create discord, otherwise the CEO would have chose a different, funnier, more obvious edit.
Instead, he chose to make a subtle change and then only admitted it after getting caught.
Would characterizing that as "an attempt to turn democrats against each other" be fair?