Running businesses that pollute less than the alternatives is a virtue.
He's not running the businesses, he's just an investor. The former gives him power to do something about it, the latter gives him plausible deniability.
Until you've made energy so expensive lower class families get an extra financial burden to handle
Investment in non-fossil fuels is exactly what was needed to make them cheaper that fossil, and in many cases they already are.
This such nonsense. Green tariffs (where 100% of electricity is from renewable sources, and sometimes a bit of your gas is biogas) are essentially the same price as non-green tariffs in the UK.
And what about in Kazakhstan? Primary source of energy is from coal. Should we let them freeze because they aren't as fortunate as you to live in the UK?
I don't see how that follows from anything I said.
If you motivate "bad" people to do good in the name of profit then who loses out
The people who rely on cheap energy for warmth and going about their day to day activities will lose out big. When money is tight, any increase in expense can be life changing. On the other side, investors and climate activists worldwide benefit