It's not too big. Metaphorically.
Realistically, it will amplify signals/readings, so, it's outdated.
Anyway, what happens when messaging with ciphertext becomes illegal?
Realistically, it will amplify signals/readings, so, it's outdated.
Anyway, what happens when messaging with ciphertext becomes illegal?
Back in the late 90s, Ron Rivest proposed Chaffing and Winnowing [0]. In that scheme, no ciphertext is transmitted and therefore no encryption is involved; only plausible plaintext is transmitted. The receiver filters out the chaff, leaving only the intended message. Perhaps one could construct an end-to-end winnow-chaff scheme (E2EWC) to replace existing E2EE schemes.
Does that mean that implementing your own protocol becomes illegal too? And even your own programming language.
> Anyway, what happens when messaging with ciphertext becomes illegal?
Those who have nefarious intentions don't really care what the legality is.. Also those who are not nefarious encrypted aren't identified because they're encrypted.. Thats why this argument seems very.. Moronic at best.