Two major versions with breaking changes per year? This seems a bit too fast paced for my taste.
But I haven't used the framework and would love the input of someone that had to maintain a Laravel project for more than a year.
Plus, this is the pace the framework has adopted for a long time now so most of the devs in the ecosystem are used to doing an upgrade once or twice a year. Generally they’re very quick. < 15 min.
I will believe that when I see it.
edit: to clarify, historically they've bumped the minor version number whenever they had major changes in the API, and now the major version bumps are usually non-breaking changes. I don't think the team fully understands Semver.
They provide LTS releases (similar to Ubuntu). I'd definitely recommend sticking to them for projects that are / will be in maintenance mode. The breaking changes are usually minor, so for actively developed projects, using the regular versions is fine.