The danger of stories
blog.businessofsoftware.org
blog.businessofsoftware.org
This seems to be worded funny, such that it is easy to misconstrue that as the conditional "If the USSR invades Poland, THEN the USA would withdraw its ambassador". That is, the consequence is not viewed as separate from the condition if the subject considers the consequence as the only possibility of the condition, then the condition portion occurring alone and the condition and the consequence occurring have exactly the same likelyhood in people's minds. After all, the consequence has no reason to occur if the condition isn't met. The USSR invades Poland and it snows in Florida are two events that, if taken together, have a smaller chance of being true than either of them occurring independently.
Stories have power. Stories have the ability to convince and teach. Stories can propogate your way of thinking. Stories can take on the chracteristics of the teller. Stories are more memorable than any powerpoint deck.
Stories will make or break your startup.
Learn to tell the right ones and to tell them well.
That's dumb. It's entirely possible for there to be a large number of possibilities, yet one to have a higher probability of occurring than all of the rest combined.
Maybe that's why I ended up wasting so much time on this stupid post.