I get the exact opposite takeaway from:

> 7. Your evaluative metrics have shifted

Yes they've shifted, but the author implies that the success in the workforce needs more rigour than school. It's the complete opposite. Your stuff needs to work in school, and your prof will grade it accordingly. In the workforce, the person 'grading' your work will likely be a product owner who just wants to get the ticket closed. You will hear things like:

* "Let's do an MVP."

* "Let's focus on the happy path."

* "How hard can it be? You're just adding a button."

* "Let's close the ticket and we can create a new ticket if we need to."

You will not hear:

* "This is important, so get it right."

* "Your code was wrong. Let's discuss"

You'll often be stuck with code that you know is flawed, that you want to fix, but the organisation won't give you time to fix it until it's too late.