The argument goes that a True False value will "mean" different things in a context, but then when trying to model a complex entity there are inevitably leakages of definitions.
For formal verification of existing Boolean logic, however, it reasons that "verifying" our truth values would be very helpful, by exploring and modeling the state space that is made up by the composition of multiple booleans. This is very interesting in that regard!
[0]: Formalizing common sense reasoning for scalable inconsistency-robust information integration using Direct Logic Reasoning and the Actor Model, Carl Hewitt. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.4852.pdf