She's 2.5. Lots of things in her life aren't voluntary. It's my responsibility and choice to keep her safe. You can let your kids watch all the lemon parties they want but I'll just keep that stuff blocked.
She's 2.5. Lots of things in her life aren't voluntary. It's my responsibility and choice to keep her safe. You can let your kids watch all the lemon parties they want but I'll just keep that stuff blocked.
If your 2.5 year old is mature enough to manage that, then yeah, maybe they ought to be able to have unfettered internet access, too.
Think of it like a child safety lock: you only need them until they can figure them out. By the time they know how they work, you can have a conversation with them about being safe around the house.
On the matter of ethics, while I don't feel inclined to filter the world away from older kids, I'm firmly believe you're wrong. There's nothing unethical about making choices for your kids until they're old enough to make informed choices. The amount of garbage online (revenge porn, sexual degradation of women, red pills) makes easy for kids to find bad information at an age where they can't process is correctly. Parents determine what age that is because that's their role and it's entirely situational.
Found your issue, go and use an adblocker (or dns-based adblock filtering)
> revenge porn
Indistinguishable from normal porn
> sexual degradation of women
Just because you are not into extreme bdsm it does not mean that it is garbage.
> red pills
Your 2.5 year olds won't be able to read it. If they somehow find a way then you simply have to explain to them why you think that it is wrong.
The only "bad information" are straight up lies.
I don't think that kids watching explicit content is something they should be doing, but treating them like property rather than someone you can genuinely influence the views of in a positive way is incredibly destructive.
Why not install an ad-blocker on the tablet and be done with it? If she's 2.5 and for some reason going to explicit sites with intention, you should be fast-tracking her to private schooling, not installing filters on information.
> not installing filters on information.
you're literally advocating opposing viewpoints in the same phrase