I think it actually does, otherwise those people wouldn't be employed at all.
And I'm curious, you say it should contribute only to "most individuals" -- which ones, specifically, in your framework, should be excluded?
And I'm curious, you say it should contribute only to "most individuals" -- which ones, specifically, in your framework, should be excluded?
And I don't think his framework actively excludes people, it's just that economies almost never contribute to all individuals equally.
Claiming that those people would still definitely be employed in a different economy is simply saying it would be the same economy. And the claim was that this utopian new economy would contribute to the "welfare of society as a whole, and most individuals within that society", so I'm curious who isn't covered under that "most".