Hacker News Reader

Comment by kiwicopple | Hacker News Reader

I assume you’re talking about conflicts from offline -> online?

This example is quite simple - it doesn’t work offline so it doesn’t have any risk of conflicts beyond the usual things a developer would face (2 ‘channels’ with the same name). This obviously sacrifices functionality for simplicity.

We plan to work on client/server conflict resolution at some stage but it’s a fairly deep hole so we need to plan out the best strategy (or multiple strategies?)

Let me know if I misinterpreted your question

View on HN

Firebase uses last write wins but they do have a backlog so the user can sync up. There is also a transaction () function for manual conflict handling. Perhaps you can automatically raise an exception in the event of conflicts.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19975921/how-does-fireba...

A bit of feedback, the API looks fairly verbose compared to Firebase so a high level wrapper would be nice. Though that could simply be a side effect of Next.js being clunky.

Amazing - thanks for the link. We've had a few people ask about sync now, so something we'll start researching soon.

> A bit of feedback, the API looks fairly verbose compared to Firebase

Thanks for this feedback. I do hope that it's just Next.js cluttering up. Here's a comparison without Next.js:

Realtime Firebase:

    db
    .collection("cities")
    .doc("SF")
    .onSnapshot(payload {
        console.log("Current data: ", payload.data())
    });

Realtime Supabase:

    supabase
     .from('cities')
     .eq('id', 'SF')
     .on('UPDATE', payload => {
        console.log("Current data: ", payload)
     })
     .subscribe()

Reply on news.ycombinator.com