> You can't have a fancy type system and interop with C strongly
ATS would disagree with this statement, strongly.
ATS would disagree with this statement, strongly.
My idea of strong interop is not having to write any glue code at all and being able to call any function. I assume there are some types that don't interface with C well.
That said, thanks for mentioning it. I should keep it in mind as it does do some of the stuff I want my language to.
typedef
struct {
int atslab__0; void *atslab__1;
} int_and_string ;
I was speaking about interfacing in the opposite direction.
No need to apologize. I also should have been more clear about what I meant by strong interoperability.
> I was speaking about interfacing in the opposite direction.
I think that having really strong interoperability requires both directions, but the being called from C is the one that is more restrictive on fancy types.
It all starts to look like COM, lol. Take care man.