Square bans the use of its service for debt collection. The ruling says doing so is a violation of civil rights.

Does this actually strengthen rights for minorities or does it dilute those right by including bill collectors under the law?

Edit: as pointed out below, I am extrapolating from a ruling on standing an implication that has not explicitly been decided one way or another. I have done this so strongly that what I posted in the second sentence above is essentially false. I'll leave it as full disclosure of my error.