> electricity+CO2+water => fuel
Considering fuel => electricity+CO2+water is financially viable today, the reverse can never be financially viable unless the prices of the inputs and outputs shift quite a bit...
Considering fuel => electricity+CO2+water is financially viable today, the reverse can never be financially viable unless the prices of the inputs and outputs shift quite a bit...
The US navy also has a use for this: at-sea refuelling of planes and other ships from the spare power from the nuclear aircraft carrier.
Unless you include the price of obtaining fuel in that transformation arrow, but then the observation boils down to if extracting fuel is cheaper than synthesizing it then synthesizing it isn't financially viable.
Most notably of the share of CO2 in each, which aims to be drastically different.