‘Long term readers will recall the Philip Cross Affair. A Wikipedia Editor named “Philip Cross” was relentlessly conducting a propaganda operation’ ..
‘The incredible thing about “Philip Cross” was that he never took a single day off. From 29 August 2013 to 14 May 2018 “Philip Cross” edited Wikipedia every day, including Christmas days, for 1,721 days.’
More interesting: do you have concrete and verifiable information that his reporting of the Philip Cross Affair, that Murray' conjectures about its background, are wrong? Can you put forward an alternative explanation?
But that does not mean he's automatically wrong, nor that he's worthy of dismissal overall. Just that I'd take more care to filter what he says than I would with, say, the beeb . Not that the beeb are beyond criticism BTW.
And I'm not disagreeing with him that this PC guy is odd and worthy of investigation.
It's just that overall fact that he indeed is openly very opinionated. That's fine, so am I, just caveat emptor.