> HTML5 + CSS3
Nope. I'm going to argue this every time I see it. It only demonstrates basic arithmetic. When an external actor has to come along and take each iteration's output and manually do things with it, you don't have Turing completeness.
Nope. I'm going to argue this every time I see it. It only demonstrates basic arithmetic. When an external actor has to come along and take each iteration's output and manually do things with it, you don't have Turing completeness.
Edit: ok I get it. Still, GP observation is hardly at that level from my (limited) perspective. Not being able to advance by itself means it's not a standalone system - otoh external actor is obviously implicit for many other examples as well. I suppose they (and me) are taking the word machine too literally.
But "pens are Turing-complete" seems a bit, well, diluted.