After he doubled the company profits during his tenure.
I guess if you have nothing really valuable to say, resort to name calling though am I right?
I guess if you have nothing really valuable to say, resort to name calling though am I right?
So, what are you upset about? Because I used his commonly understood nick name to say it?
That's what somebody in his position would claim. A more objective statement would be: "The company profits doubled during his tenure".
Besides, we have no idea what would have happened if a Pichai-style leader professing love for open source and sound understanding of the role of the Internet appeared instead.