> a high achieving middle schooler at a high income district, this would be amazing for their development
the builders of tomorrow are getting even better education right now? is that what you're saying? that sounds great
the builders of tomorrow are getting even better education right now? is that what you're saying? that sounds great
The kids who were already statistically bound for a positive outcome due to family and income are fine, and locking that in even tighter. The kids who have hurdles have EVEN HIGHER hurdles now.
That would be a sad indictment of our society if true.
You say that like it's evidence against (rather than for) it being true.
Giving better schools to students that highly achieve at least has some justification, but is probably unnecessary if we get all the schools up to 'competent' and have some money for various kinds of advanced placement programs.