Hacker News Reader

Agreed, and that original title is the actual title of the linked article itself.

For what it's worth, I understood what was meant with the current title. Not saying it shouldn't be added, but for me it was OK.

This was probably done because of the (draconian) character limit imposed by HN on post titles... If it was me I would have removed the middle "e" in Addresses to comply.... aka Addrsses

Certainly it's not _completely_ different, though it does largely neuter the editorializing that is a main point of the article.

What really happened here is a judge orders an agency to comply with the freedom of information act because the agency had not made a sufficient case that it was exempted from doing so in this instance. Doesn't address who is right about the "fakeness" question.