Hacker News Reader

Comment by flashdance | Hacker News Reader

That's exactly what it is. If you recall, these image based captchas were originally in 2007 for digitizing books. [1]

In 2012, Google started using captchas to identify house numbers from google street view. [2]

Now, users are identifying cars, bikes, traffic lights, and crosswalks most of the time. While Google/Alphabet has been mum on what specifically they're using the data for, it is speculated by engineers at competing firms that they are using this data to help Alphabet's subsidiary, Waymo, with its self-driving car program. [3] This data is either used as training data or to validate outputs that were already classified by their system.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReCAPTCHA

[2] https://techcrunch.com/2012/03/29/google-now-using-recaptcha...

[3] https://www.ceros.com/originals/recaptcha-waymo-future-of-se...

View on HN

> Now, users are identifying cars, bikes, traffic lights, and crosswalks most of the time.

I got umbrellas the other day.

If you are a self driving car you definitely do not want to misclassify an umbrella as they almost never get about independently.

I have serious, serious doubts about the whole approach of "identify known objects in a camera feed so you can try not to hit them". I don't know what the current approaches are but there needs to be some kind of subsumption setup where if you don't recognize an object, at the very least you assume it's a stationary solid object and you don't hit it. It doesn't matter if your classifier says it's a brick, or a grandma, or a hibiscus, or (unknown). Unless you've positively identified it as something that's safe to hit (say, a plastic bag wafting along in the breeze) then don't hit it.

If you do have an identification then you can layer behaviours on top of this (eg. Is it a person? They usually walk forward or in the direction they're looking, so anticipate this.) But the default behaviour cannot be "dunno what that is so I'll ignore it".

"Don't hit the thing" is the most basic, fundamental behaviour for a self driving vehicle.

I couldn't agree more.

And this is why I like to call them "Self-Crashing Cars".

I'm fully capable of ploughing in to moving and stationary objects at high speed, under acceleration, myself. Thank you very much.

And OTA updates that can change the behaviour of the vehicle between uses? Just no. I have enough trouble switching between my Japanese and European cars (one of each) where the indicator stalks are on opposite sides of the steering column. I'm forever indicating my intention to turn with the wipers!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com