May I kindly ask, why do you feel the need to jump out and defend the human species as also being good in the face of what is described in the article?
I am genuinely interested in understanding what motivates this reaction.
I am genuinely interested in understanding what motivates this reaction.
I also think there's a tendency to anchor on what "is". Just because things are natural doesn't make them implicitly "good". And how does one define quality in the first place?
Put another way, what is the distinction between natural and artificial? Are humans not part of nature? And will "nature" not be here long after we've destroyed ourselves, if in fact we do?