Hacker News Reader

Comment by kristoph1 | Hacker News Reader

GIFs ate fair use, it’s not a copyright issues, also not using YouTube api.

> GIFs [are] fair use

Are they, though? Fair use only covers use for the purpose of criticism and parody (as in, making fun of the original work, not just making up your own lyrics to a popular tune).

> not using YouTube api

Even if you're not using their API, it still counts as a ToS violation. But since downloading YouTube videos is the main feature of your tool, there's not much you can do about it.

There are number of things that court would consider if its fair use, GIFs generally fall into that category, there haven't been a case brought to courts yet, but doesn't mean there won't be.

> not using YouTube api

Which means, like youtube-dl, it will break every week or two

More like every three weeks, but who's counting :)

Also I like to add, I've build number of applications using an API only to regret the time I spent on it later. When you rely on external API, its really not your product and you don't own it, API owns you and every move you make. Instead, I would rather rely on a strong community for support such as YouTube-DL, even though there are issues and its not perfect, still much better than API route, just my two cents.

I wouldn't be surprised if it used youtube-dl under the hood.

They do sometimes break it. I've had to on occasion pass other header options along with it to look more like a generic web browser.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com