Hacker News Reader

That it actually takes 20 seconds implies to me that actual people are viewing the content. I don't see any automated system taking that long as I do believe they would just throw more resources at the problem.

View on HN

I dunno, to process a video (maybe 20-80 seconds) and scan for suspicious text/speech? I was impressed that it was under a minute.

I wonder though... do we know enough now to know at what rate actual people view the content, vs just automated processing?

Humans in the loop just makes the machine more complicated. You can still give them spurious correlations?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com