Hacker News Reader

Comment by rcamera | Hacker News Reader

"It wants to be a general-purpose network surveying tool, but is constrained to the UX of a port scanner."

What exactly does that mean? Nmap certainly isn't constrained to the UX of a port scanner. In fact, their expansion wasn't even in the form of bundled build, you can get all the tools separated, like: nmap, nping, ncat, ncrack...

So actually, it really isn't detracting from its basic purpose, you can still run simple network scans. But, if you got the knowledge, skills and the other tools installed, you can then also do much than advanced network scans, like vulnerability discovery and exploitation, passwords bruteforcing, etc...

Your comment isn't making much sense to me, please help me understand.

View on HN

It has N different kinds of "stealth" scans that all produce the same kernel of valuable information, it has an elaborate (and, against most corporate networks from external vantage points, not particularly accurate or helpful) OS detection scheme, it runs scripts, it produces stdout and file output in a variety of complicated formats (it really just wants to be a service hooked up to a database), it runs scripts, IT RUNS SCRIPTS, come on. This isn't a serious argument. You just like nmap. That's fine; I think nmap is impressive too.

Oh, and it takes _for_ _ever_ to run. I'll pastie the 50 line EventMachine scripts I race it with when people on my team get stuck waiting for 12-hour nmap runs.

I'd like to see those scripts when they are posted, thanks.

Sure. You know how simple this task is when you have an event loop, right? Here, I'll write a port scanner right now:

  class HostProbe 
    module Probe
      attr_accessor :bp
      def connection_completed
        @win = true
      end

      def unbind
        self.bp.closed(self, @win)
      end
    end

    def closed(obj, won) 
      @inflight_now -= 1
      port = @inflight_q.delete(obj)
      if won                 
        puts "%TARGET-LISTENING: #{ @target }:#{ port }"
      end
      fill()
    end

    def sweep
      Generator.new do |g|
        (1..65535).each {|port| g.yield port}
      end
    end

    def fill
      @inflight_now.upto(@inflight_max) {
        @inflight_now += 1
        if(port = @sweep.next) 
          EventMachine::connect(@target, port, Probe) do |c|
            c.bp = self
            @inflight_q[c] = port
          end
        end 
      }
    end

    def initialize(host, opts={}) 
      @target = host
      @sweep = sweep
      @inflight_q = {}
      @inflight_now = 0
      @inflight_max = opts[:inflight_max] || 10
      fill()
    end
  end

  EventMachine::run { 
    HostProbe.new(ARGV[0])
  }

I think that may be it? I'm not even going to bother seeing if it evaluates. I write that stupid script once a month or so. There is probably a set of nmap options that crushes it for speed, but with the default options and a firewalled target network (ie: most professional nmap targets), I lap nmap with it.

(Ok, you also have to disconnect when you hit a listening socket. Oops.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com