You just have to think for yourself and weigh the evidence, be humble and open to other perspectives. Mindlessly following perceived experts won’t save you.
You just have to think for yourself and weigh the evidence, be humble and open to other perspectives. Mindlessly following perceived experts won’t save you.
What a gem to read, absurt funny title "The Grad Student Who Never Said "No".
And the fact that at least 54 times people took a snapshot of the webpage.
We should print this on toilet paper and sell it to universities.
It doesn't sound likely to me, but neither do a bunch of other cognitive results (the gorilla running through the basketball court comes to mind).
I'm all for questioning and rerunning tests, but dismissing them because they seem clearly fanciful without data just brings us back to pre-science. Science which is only allowed to discover plausible-sounding things isn't science at all.
There's an interesting chapter in Jaynes' Probability Theory: the Logic of Science where he talks about how much evidence it would take to convince him that ESP is real. At the time that book was written, there were experiments supporting it that failed to replicate.
Basically you're totally allowed to read a scientific study, say "okay, that's an interesting result", and then still not believe the conclusion if you have enough reason to doubt the premise a-priori.