Churning out content on w/e the stats say is trending would be a shit way for a writer to express their creativity.
Churning out content on w/e the stats say is trending would be a shit way for a writer to express their creativity.
Actually, Paul Miller made no bones about the fact that AOL was the reason he left Engadget. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2238175
Arianna Huffington (the new Cheif Editor of all AOL content sites) said she won't be messing with TechCrunch and Engadget.
Their most recent article other than the resignation letter:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/12/htc-droid-incredible-2-sm...
- 3 sentence summary gives them a strong chance of hitting their rev per article goals.
- 3 internal links and a shitton of tags to reinforce their SEO
- 1 solitary little external link at the bottom to minimize the SEO juice they leak
If your job involves tagging summaries with "Android 2.2" and "Android2.2" then you're working the Aol Way™, even if it's not official.